A LoRA trained on all 100 plates of Kunstformen der Natur. Scroll to explore the training run and generated plates directly β drag, scrub, click.








Drag to scrub through the run. Loss drops for ~50 epochs, then goes flat β the remaining ~74 epochs bought almost nothing.
step 750 Β· converging
Captions never mentioned background color, so the model guessed. Fixed by measuring each plate's real background from its pixels β a clean, wide split, not a guess.
Two rounds of fine-tuning later (including one that doubled pale-example exposure for 40 more epochs), here's the honest result on the 12-plate eval sample β no net gain between rounds, some plates just traded places:
6/11 correct background color (1 plate excluded β full outdoor scene, not a flat-background plate)
Same caption the model trained on. A win, a nuanced case, and an honest miss β not cherry-picked.

Tafel 84 β Navicula, Diatomea. β correct black bg β a genuine win.

Tafel 26 β Carmaris, Trachomedusae. β correct pale bg, but the jellyfish rendered as an abstract cage.

Tafel 42 β Ostracion, Ostraciontes. β teal, not pale β didn't move across two fine-tuning rounds.
Prompts that don't exist in the training set. No ground truth β the question is plausibility.





